Friday, April 27, 2007

AMD Turion64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52 1.6 GHz Notebook PC.

I know this is something that I should of posted a while ago, but there was a problem with the Intel Duo Core Centrino Laptop that I purchased a while ago. The laptop I cleaned on a daily basis, or every other day and kept it in top shape.
However, there was a small accident that I had with it when I was cleaning it one day. When I was cleaning the laptop, the cloth caught the tab key, completely damaging the key from the laptop, rendering switching between windows painful and annoying. After trying to get the key placed back on to the laptop, I had decided to let Staples be responsible for sending the laptop away, to Hewlett-Packard to be repaired. All is well, so far.... but....
Hewlett-Packard after almost one month, contacted Staples telling them that they needed to send out a package, which I then would have to put my laptop in to, and send to HP. OK, does anyone here see something funny? Here is a recap:
  1. I gave my Intel Duo Core Centrino (dv2000 / dv2037us) laptop to Staples, to have them send to Hewlett-Packard for repair.
  2. Staples then generated documentation stating that I released my laptop to them to be sent in for repairs, and stating that Staples accepted the laptop to be sent in for repairs.
  3. Hewlett-Packard accepted the repair order, and recieved the laptop after quite a long time.
  4. Hewlett-Packard calls Staples up stating that I would have to send them a laptop, from packaging that Hewlett-Packard would send me. I would need proof of purchase, warranty information, including but not limited to extended plans for service, etc.

Well, I gave Staples a lot of hell, and I even threatened to sue them, and was considering even doing that to Hewlett-Packard, specially after I told Staples that they can have the laptop, to keep, sell or do whatever with; but they would have a lawsuit following shortly after.

The irony is, that very same call after almost a month, turned in to the manager of Staples saying that I could come in with the:

  1. proof of purchase of the Hewlett-Packard Intel Duo Core Centrino Laptop;
  2. the extended service plans, packaging, and other shipped content and materials;
  3. the Windows Vista Home Premium Upgrade I had purchased a couple months later

And all the money that was given at the time of purchase between the Intel Duo Core Centrino, and the Windows Vista Home Premium Upgrade was returned in a Staples Cash Card, inlcuding the $159.95 (not including tax) for the Windows Vista Home Premium upgrade. In addition, the manager even said I had a choice of any laptop (or laptops,) as long as it did not exceed the full price I paid for the laptop I returned; or a desktop (or desktops,) as long as it did not exceed the price I paid for the laptop I returned.

All I must say is, "WOW". Now here is even more good news. The new laptop that I have is the Hewlett-Packard (HP) dv9000 (dv9310us) laptop, with the following specifications:

  • Windows Vista Home Premium (32 bit version though, bleh)
  • AMD Turion64x2 1.6 GHz (CPU1: 1.6 GHz / CPU2: 1.6 GHz)
  • 1024 MB (1 GB) memory
  • 32/64/128 shared video (appears to have it's own dedicated too)
  • 120 GB SATA hard disk
  • DVD (+/-) CDR/RW
  • 17" LCD Wide-Screen (HD)
  • Full size keyboard / Touchpad
  • HD audio sound system

And one of the best things I like, despite rumors from other web sites saying that Hewlett-Packard has discontinued providing discs for their laptops, the HP dv9000 (dv9310us) does in fact include the Windows Vista DVD (including; Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, and the Ultimate, including the "N" releases of Vista) on one single DVD.

I really cannot complain about the copy of Windows Vista DVD and the recovery partition, or the Recovery Discs that I had to create being 32 bit -- there is a lot you cannot do on the x64 version of Windows, which I will not go in to detail. I am however trying to get a USB 2.0 case, which would allow me to use an external drive to mess around with other platforms without actually causing any regrettable harm to the partitions of my HP; which I doubt but there is always the possibitility lurking around. This is one reason I love building my own systems, but laptops I don't think I will ever build my own.

Below is the link to my laptop that I am now running:

http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/store_access.do?template_type=product_detail&product_code=RU971UA%23ABA&jumpid=oc_R1002_USENC-001_HP%20Pavilion%20dv9310us%20Notebook%20PC&lang=en&cc=us

Monday, April 09, 2007

Some very annoying things.

This is a bunch of things that have been bugging the hell of me, and I know it is bugging the hell out of many others -- and what I find funny, it seems the people behind it could care less yet they want to make an attempt to "better the world," in most cases and in other, "get in to it for themselves".


COMMERCIALS.
Last night I was watching "Death Warrant" on USA, and switching between that to another show that was on another channel to avoid the COMMERCIALS that seem to be growing every day. However, "Death Warrant" was scheduled to end at 04:00 AM EST, and guess what? The movie was cut off at 03:00 AM EST (no where near the end of the movie,) for INFOMERCIALS.

What the hell is that all about? So, I turned off USA and switched back to TBS and the same thing happened on TBS that happened on USA. Now, here is the funny thing. I was talking to my mom about it and she was laughing and said, "Now you know how I felt when I was watching a movie on TNT the other night!".

OK, now here is where something has got to be done! All the channels have commercials that at one point used to be anywhere between 3-4 commercials every 5 minutes or so; now it seems it has grown to 5-8 commercials every 3-4 minutes; sometimes there are more commercials then there is the actual movie.

20 years ago, I could say there was no commercials that had to do with erectial disfunctions, or yeast infections, although there were commercials for P.M.S, and you also have commercials for just about every damn thing known to man and woman; allergies, infections, flu, cold, diseases, along with other things -- and you all know the problems that can result:

- may cause sinus infections, bleeding from [insert body parts here], inability to sleep or stay awake, may cause vomiting, [add about 1000 other problems] as a result of using [product]. Contact your doctor if any of these problems occur or occur for more than [#] of days.

I am sorry, but half of those problems would prevent me from even touching the damn drug in the first place. Needless to say, does anyone know where or when they will have a drug that will take care of the commercials and infomercials? Hell, I wouldn't care if it caused me to not be able to walk anymore, or talk, as long as I can watch a movie without it being interrupted, especially so damn rudely like the other night.

The ELECTIONS for Mayor or President this time around has been at an all-time-worst in history, according to the news and I agree completely. Certain channels, specially the important ones, you see something that has to do with with someone not doing what they say, not doing their job or how they're going to correct this, etc. It is all just a scheme to blow smoke up everyone's rear end and say, "I won!" at the end. Although there have been quite a few in history that have done more then the other, and have done almost everything they said, but you know politics are like humans, far from perfect. And there is a commercial just about every other commercial and almost instantly the very first commercial to start, related to elections and who is putting who down, who is winning, or has done what, etc.

ONLINE ADVERTISING.
This is almost the same as the advertising you see on television, except, it's non-stop and very much more constant then on television. Take a look at MySpace as an example, advertising is all over the place, the same with Yahoo!, America Online, and millions of other services.

Granted, they help keep the services free, and allow the services to remain free -- but has anyone ever heard of "excessive" or "excessiveness"? I surf the web all day and all night (practically as long as I am awake,) and I see the Google AdSense, and other advertising schemes.

And now the adware/spyware authors are implementing their unwanted software by using this type of method, besides installing it on to your system with or without your consent. Now I must say, and there are several others who agree, that the use of adware/spyware should be illegal and as such, should be prosecuted to the maximum extent by law. I mean, if you think about it, if any person attacks your computer, breaks in to your computer, your network, or otherwise, the person in question can go directly to jail for computer theft, possibly damaging property, etc.

This is the same if someone broke in to your house, but they'd be charged with Breaking and Entering ("B&E",) and it seems the charges for one is more harsh then the other. Just recently, on Craig's List someone had posted an ad, saying "help yourself" somewhere in the message, that the person was moving or something (this is something I heard on the news the other day,) and well, the house was cleaned out and it was not the person who placed the ad.

Anyway, back to the online advertising. Do we really need to be bombarded with 100,000,000,000 or more advertisements while we're surfing a site? I do not think we do, and infact, a lot of people refuse to return to the site after an excessive amount unless the service is really damn good. But that is my opinion; I know I actually became a member of America Online again since they went "free", but guess what -- I hardly use America Online due to all the advertising, the lack of the services they used to offer as a paid service, all of the "requirements" now in order to obtain a service such as the Chat Rooms, you need a valid credit card to confirm you're 18 years of age or older (or where you live, "legal age",) and such. I will be 30 very soon, and I refuse to use a CC with America Online to confirm my age, I was a member there a couple of times, but usually left them because of one thing or another -- and the America Online client has become bloated; the amount of stuff America Online installs is insane.

The AOL installation should be more custom to the "advanced" users who do not wish to install a load of software when they may already have protection, a secure network, a secure system, etc. Plus, AOL has loads of advertisements all over the place, and no matter where you go, you are bombared with advertisements.

There is however a couple tricks that you could apply to bypass the advertisements online, but it requires a lot of updating on your end; which I will not go in to details with. Here is a question, but not a serious question: Are computers and the internet really becoming faster, or are they becoming slower?

Think about these; (i) The internet is infact becoming faster, and more and more people are going broadband and highspeed; and as a result it seems more advertising is coming as a result. (ii) The computers are becoming faster and faster every day, and as a result more and more viruses are being created, to turn your "innocent system" in to a "zombie", a "server" or something where you may be sending files to other individual(s) without knowing it, and could be sued for it. (iii) The adware and spyware scene is growing, and this as well as viruses can slow your system down; so you think about those. (I recommend having good anti-adware/spy applications installed, keep your system up to date, a good anti-virus scanner installed, and from time to time even use the online anti-virus scanners.

PEDOPHILES.
There are laws that protect people from being stalked by another individual, or a group of individuals, and these laws apply to online as well.

There are laws that protect people from being abused by another individual, or a group of individuals who physically and verbally abuse them, and these laws apply online as well.

There are laws that protect people from sexual abuse, sexual harassment, exposing themselves in a manner considered inappropiate, especially if it is a child or a group of children.

My question here is, when an adult who is sexually attracted to young children gets in to trouble with the law, and becomes a criminal and therefore has a criminal record against them, and labeled as a pedophile, the rights that the adult has become very restricted and limited. These include, but are not limited to the following:

(i). being limited and prohibited from entering play grounds and other areas nearby a playground, including environments where children might be such as McDonalds, Burger King, Pizza Hut, and other places.

(ii). not being allowed or prohibited from teaching classes, or to perform other educational classes that may have children around.

(iii). limited, restricted or prohibited from living in a neighborhood where children might be living, playing around, etc.

(iv). limited, restricted or prohibited from accessing the internet where children might be located. This includes Internet Relay Chat ("IRC,") Paltalk, Yahoo!, Microsoft Messenger, America Online Instant Messenger ("AIM,") as well as MySpace, and others.

Now, how can a pedophile or a possible pedophile get away with putting up a web site containing information on how not to get caught, providing pictures and other content for both existing and new pedophiles, get away with it? OK, you might wonder and ask yourself, "How can they get away with that?!?!" it's quite simple. According to the POLICE, the person in question does not have a criminal record.

But yet, if you are attempting to lure children from where they may, to your house for sexual activities, and you get caught, you're automatically in trouble. Do you see where I am going with this? I hope so, because it is one disgusting subject, and I cannot believe that this actually exists.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

What the...

I say, "What the..." for several reasons. One of them being is that my laptop (the "Centrino") is in the shop, and has been since over a week and a half now almost. The reason why it is in the shop, I kept that damn thing clean on a daily basis, if not, every other day -- and the tab key broke. So I put it in the shop for repair, no way I was going to walk around or use it looking like it was hit by a car bomb; or it looking ghetto.

The second thing is, I finally got Mac OS X 10.4 (upgraded to Mac OS X 10.4.9) and the thought of it taking up a trillion gigabytes is insane. OK, it don't take up that much, but seeing Mac OS 9 and Mac OS X 10.2, then Mac OS X 10.4 (10.4 is insane in space usage) to be honest. I am going out to get a brand new 200-300 GB hard drive, but I do not know if I am putting the 160 from my AMD Duron on this system and the 200-300 on the Duron, or the 200-300 on this. I do not know, the "stability, security, and reliability" of Mac, I probably should place the bigger on the Mac, if I do use it as a "file share" or something like I do the other system.

Another thing today, I got tired of squinting at a 14-15" monitor with Mac, and it is not just Mac, it is also Linux and FreeBSD (which I know Mac is based off, the BSD part,) and the GUI is not all that bad, but the text part is horrid in the GUI portion. Windows is better viewable, but hell, Apple was fast to attack Windows Vista; HELLO Apple, you do the same crap as Windows Vista does. (to a degree).

OK, here are a few things I am going to bitch about Mac (Apple, Inc.) and Windows (Microsoft Corporation.)

  1. When installing a program under Microsoft Windows Vista, you are prompted and asked for administration access to continue. Apple was fast to complain and attack this, when in fact that Mac OS X does the very same thing -- sometimes even more.

    * This is a security feature, and for our protection; stop bashing Microsoft when you are making yourselves look as stupid.

  2. The Mac OS is supposed to be based off BSD, which it is, but why was /usr/ports taken away from the platform? This is one of the greatest features of BSD; sure there is the DarwinPorts and Fink, but those two programs are in my opinion, not as good.

    * Example: There is no (as far as I am aware of,) "make search name=[string]" without the brackets. Fink don't have it, never tried DarwinPorts yet. Plus, I am very limited on space with Mac OS X 10.4, unlike Mac OS X 10.2 where I would of have had 5 GB space just on this drive, when I only have maybe 4-5% of that space left. Yeah, I am watching what I do till I get off my rear and go out and buy that 200-300 GB HD and reinstall the Mac OS X 10.4 system, and install the updates again. Otherwise, Mac OS X 10.4 has been a great install, and I must say it is better than 10.2 if you can run it.

  3. Mac OS X 10.2 and Mac OS X 10.4 are NOT better looking than Windows XP or Vista; I agree with this completely. If you want "eye candy" Mac OS X does not offer much of it. Stability is a different story, but Windows Vista does ask your permission before doing a lot. (Mac OS X does too,) and even if you do allow it under Windows Vista, Vista tends to prevent it in several ways.

  4. A PowerPC G3 350 MHz with 448 MB RAM (PC-133) with Mac OS X 10.2/10.2.8 can be as slow as Windows XP on a Pentium II 500. I will not go in to details on this, but it does seem to be that way very easily -- could it be that the "PowerPC" is a stronger system by hardware? (like I said, I won't get in to details.) HOWEVER. I must ask, why the hell do Mac users say, a "Mac is a MAC, a PC is a "PC", yet, where the hell did PowerPC come from? .... I guess that is a problem or a issue -- Apple, time to execute a patch. ;)

  5. Microsoft is always claiming "bugs, problems, glitches" and sometimes "issues" or "problems." Apple is hardly ever uses those terms, but commonly uses "issues" and "problems". Now that I think about it, the few times I did see comments by Steve Jobs, I never heard or seen him go, "Oops. Sometimes that happens." remember "Windows 95, with Bill Gates"? Can't say anything more here, but that was funny with Bill Gates.
I really should have left the house by now, and been installing my brand new hard drive, but I am not sure what system I want to install it under. I know there are several out there that will or are saying, "INSTALL THE 160 and the 200-300 in to the MAC and blow the PC up!", I will do that some day, maybe, but not any time soon.

I do in fact have a few PC boxes I could blow up, but I won't do it, due to legal issues with the law enforcement in my township. And I do not want to take any chances, and I don't want to ask them if it is OK, because if someone whines in the neighborhood, I don't want to go to jail/prison for fun.

I was going to say, "does anyone have anything to donate" as far as computers goes; I could always use computer parts. But, I don't want to get greedy. There are others who can use it a lot more than I can. There are some parts I could use, but there is a site I am a member of, you're more than welcome to check out (http://www.freecycle.org/) and it is a large group.

There are several cities and states covered by http://www.freecycle.org/ but if not, you can request to become a leader; if I remember right. It's been a while because it's been quite in my area. I've been meaning to put some stuff on it (around the Upper Darby/Philadelphia, PA,) area, but I've been too busy with other things.

There is one thing I must ask about the Mac vs. PC argument real fast; why does it seem that Windows updates faster than Mac? Apple has the software already compiled (as far as I know,) and they know what system you're running, so they know what to send you -- same with Windows. Hmm... UNIX/Linux is supposed to have better TCP/IP connections, as well as TCP/UDP, etc., anyway, up to a lot of you to think and research. ( I know the answer, sort of, but something for you to mess with. )

I am guessing, as much as I am loving Mac, I am hating it the same (same with Windows). I do not really care, because both systems are great; one better then the other for several things, as the other is for the other. Mac IS NOT BETTER then Windows, and Windows is NOT BETTER then Mac.

I am going to take a small break, and publish something later on, I need to start getting ready to get the hard drive for the Mac or PC and swap the PC's drive into this one (probably going to give the Mac a gift, and install the new one in it.) But I don't know yet. In fact, I am going to call the store and see what they'd recommend. (few people I know say, "new one in the Mac, you already setup the 160, and unless you want downtime, don't swap them.") so go figure.

There should be a update or a new message in a bit today. Take it easy everyone, and do not be afraid to write/reply/comment or whatever.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

To keep your system running smoothly.

In order to keep your system running smoothly, you should keep the following installed at all times:

  • Firewall
  • Anti-Virus
  • Anti-Spyware, Adware, Malware

Symantec is a product YOU DO NOT WANT TO INSTALL, it uses too many resources, and it can cause too many problems on most machines; from my experiences, and by what others do say on a daily basis.

NOTES: Do not accept or download files from strangers, or people you do not trust. And even if you do trust them, scan them by multiple scanners (online scanners, and scanners otherwise,) if you want to take time.

Do NOT download illegal software, content, products, source code, applications or otherwise, and do not download unlawful content, products, source code, applications or otherwise, including any unofficial content and material. This is a major reason why you can become infected by a virus.

** A note to the above, if you do not surf the internet out of ignorance, or carelessness, you will most likely not become infected. I am just telling you, I know otherwise, so I am not sharing all of my experiences, knowledge, or otherwise. (just trust your gutt.)

For good and free protection, try the following products out:

HOWEVER, I RECOMMEND that YOU do the FOLLOWING on a daily, or a every other day basis:

  • DEFRAG your drivers; Do this always, even if your system is used a bit -- do it when your systems are not being used period. (Trust me, it can never hurt.)
  • CHKSDK (SCANDISK) your drives too, because any errors that are found, can sometimes be corrected; therefore saving you in the end. (You can also purchase a program that fixes bad sectors, that a lot of stores do NOT want you to know about *cough* SpinRite as an example.
  • Registry Defrag can also help you too, as it can speed your system up similar to DEFRAGing your drives.
  • Try NOT to fill up, and try NOT to keep your drives filled. The more files you have on your system, and the more software you have installed, the slower your system can become.

The bottom line is, check your system on a daily basis and perform maintainence or do it every other day, and keep a backup, and do it frequently.

Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition [Upgrade] DVD.

Hello, everyone.

As most of you already may know, Microsoft Corporation has had some information leaked out again. This is not something I want to post on my site, so consider this a easter egg. You can go purchase Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium (not sure of others,) and get all the other versions right at your finger tips.

And as most of you already know, I use a HP Pavilion dv2000 (dv2037us) laptop, that came with Windows XP Home Edition SP2 pre-installed with a ****load of software that nobody will ever use, or most will never use, or hardly ever use. I have other computers too, and I must say, I love building my own systems but laptops are a pain in the *** to build when compared to desktops. But Windows XP Vista Home Premium has been great, except for the "Paltalk" problem, which I think this article will clear up some. (wasn't my fault, mostly, and was not the drivers either, it was "Paltalk").

However, there is a small drawback. The Product ID that you get, is only valid for the copy you purchase. So if you purchase, say what I did, Windows Vista Home Premium, it will not work for the other copies that are on the DVD. Additionally, if you purchase the UPGRADE, it cannot be used for the FULL install and vice-versa.

On my Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition DVD [UPGRADE], the following are already on it, including a couple others not mentioned; too lazy to type them:

1. Vista Business Edition
2. Vista Home Basic Edition
3. Vista Home Premium Edition
4. Vista Starter Edition
5. Vista Ultimate Edition

Now since I only have a valid license for #3 [upgrade], I cannot perform a full install -- but there is apparently a trick (I have yet to figure it out, to get a full install, only did it twice.) and I don't plan on trying it to figure it out.

I do not support software piracy, illegal and unlawful actions, these are (as far as I am aware of,) legal; as long as you have a valid license for such and do not abuse it. Follow these steps:

1. Insert your Windows Vista DVD.

When your system says, "Press any key to boot from CD-ROM/DVD-ROM...." or whatever it is that will be shown to boot from CD/DVD, press it.

2. Continue as you normally would, but when you're asked to enter your Product ID, do NOT enter your Product ID, click NEXT and follow the instructions. You can sample all the versions of Windows Vista and ones that are not mentioned for (30 days, usually, my copy you can.)

3. If you do have valid Product ID (valid as in, YOU OWN THAT PRODUCT LICENSE) you can run from there safely.

* When I say, if you have a VALID Product ID, if you purchased Ultimate and the DVD for the Ultimate became damaged, and a friend has Windows Vista Home Premium Upgrade or FULL, a legal disc, you could install that on to your system using YOUR Product ID.


-----------------------------------------
I am assuming, which I hate to, go on a limb, but I read this from somewhere else, and earlier today I was screwing around with my system -- installed Windows XP Home Edition 3x, Windows Vista 3x, and other operating systems because I was bored - now I am back on Vista; because "Paltalk" was pissing me off, I couldn't talk to anyone on it, because it was Vista.

I will admit, I did forget myself for a while there, Windows Vista is fairly new to consumers, and that being said, a lot of companies and others are playing "catch up," so software and products are still not compatible. You'd think after all the years that Vista has been in development, the companies (hardware and software) would of already been ready. Yeah right!
-----------------------------------------

If you use Paltalk (http://www.paltalk.com/) I would suggest that you download, install and use the Paltalk 9.1 Beta software if you're using Microsoft Windows Vista, especially if you use the same laptop that I use. The reason why I am saying this is, because I have been at it for quite a long time, trying to get my microphone to work with Paltalk, only to find out it was not me, that it was Paltalk software itself; and after screwing around all day long hacking, messing with, and screwing with, as well as tweaking Windows Vista.

I know that as soon as Windows Vista has a service pack, I am going to slipstream my copy of Windows Vista Home Premium and putting the original away, because a lot is bound to change over time. Knowing my luck, Microsoft will change things around and prevent slipstreaming.

So, I will recommend to you, as Microsoft and others do, UPGRADE your drivers (audio, memory, sound, video, etc.) before you upgrade to Windows Vista; this includes patches, security updates, patches, fixes, and such. Then, if you feel safe and comfortable, install Vista. And from my experience, you cannot dual-boot Windows Vista UPGRADe with Windows XP. :(

Windows Vista Ultimate is NICE, although I believe and feel strong that the ENCRYPTION offered in Ultimate should be available in BUSINESS and HOME PREMIUM (They're talking about security on laptops, and Home Premium is a recomendtation to laptops,) you'd think that BitLocker would of been included. Can we say, "Nice move Microsoft".

Oh, one other thing -- Why the hell can you FTP to your own IIS7 server in Ultimate but not Home Premium, and yet, Visual Studio 200* can FTP *ASP*, of course, copy local drive, ugh, I am not going to gripe anymore. Microsoft did good with Vista, but screwed up again. Hell, Mac is good but they have quite a few bugs, OOOPS, "issues" or "problems".

Take a look at http://www.apple.com/ and you will never see (or almost never) see them call it a "bug", they call it a problem or a issue. (I forget where I seen that at, but I read it, and it does seem to be that way, and I own a Mac, so it makes me feel special -- NOT. LOL.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Oh my god! No, not Vista, but Vista.

Windows Vista has actually installed, successfully, and is working without any problems at all. There are some random pauses, from anywhere between 2 seconds, around 2 minutes -- but I think that is merely because of the amount of memory installed on this system. The system with the installation working is a:

* AMD Duron processor (1.8 GHz)
* 768 MB DDR PC-2700 memory
* 160 GB HD with 16 MB cache
* GeForce 6200 NVIDIA (PNY)
* Memorex DVD +/- DVD-R/RW
* Creative PC-DVD 5X (DVD-ROM)

The strange thing is, I got so annoyed and fustrated after having to wait for the system to stop freezing, hanging up, even crashing, that instead of smashing it, I got up, left the room and figured it would do it on it's own. Instead, somehow, it started working instead.

So, to my previous posting,

The bottom line to this entire article is: DO NOT PURCHASE A COPY OF MICROSOFT WINDOWS VISTA (any version,) UNLESS YOU HAVE THE ABSOLUTE TIME ON YOUR HANDS TO SCREW YOUR SYSTEM UP, OR TO TAKE CHANGES THAT IT MAY OR MAY NOT WORK ON YOUR SYSTEM. FOR ALL THE TROUBLES, THE PROBLEMS, AGRIVATION, AND OTHER CRAP, MICROSOFT SHOULD OF PAID ME TO PICK UP A COPY, OR BETTER YET, HAVE GIVEN ME A FREAKING COPY.


Purchase it, but purchase it expecting to have possible problems (more or less then what I have had, or what http://blog.gamecraft.org/2007/01/windows-vista-ultimate-installed had, among several other Vista users.

Windows Vista Conclusion.

I have officially drawn my conclusion about Windows Vista Home Premium by Microsoft. This conclusion is also regarding other versions of Windows Vista; Home Basic, Business, Ultimate. (And Microsoft said there is also a “Windows Vista Enterprise”, but I’ve never seen it.

Below, I have actually taken the time out to touch the worthless box that Windows Vista has come in, to show you the specifications Windows Vista Home Premium says it needs in order to operate. And before anything is said, I have used the Vista Upgrade Advisor and it says that the system it is installed on now, is fully compatible (coughbullcacacough).

My laptop is supposed to be fully compatible with Windows Vista, another load of crap (except that one is being fed by HP themselves, and according to the hardware; so where are all of the drivers for Windows Vista HP? I love how you can get a “free copy of Windows Vista”, based on the Windows XP installation that comes with select desktops, and notebooks, but the sad thing is, I purchased my laptop not long before October 26, 2006 and they said I am not eligible. I personally do not think that is fair, and others agree too, specially for the amount of money that laptops cost.

Recommended system requirements

1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64 bit (x64) processor
1 GB of system memory
40 GB hard drive space with at least 15 GB of available space
Support for DirectX 9 graphics with
- WDDM Driver
- 128 MB of graphics memory (minimum)
- Pixel Shader 2.0 in hardware
- 32 bits per pixel
DVD-ROM drive
Audio output
Internet access (fees may apply)

Additional Requirements to use certain features
TV tuner card required for TV functionality (compatible remote control optional)
Windows Tablet and Touch Technology requires a Table PC or a touch screen.

Actual requirements and product functionality may vary based on your system configuration. Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor can help you determine which features and edition of Windows Vista will run on your computer; visit www.windowsvista.com/upgradeadvisor. For complete Windows Vista requirements, visit www.windowsvista.com/systemrequirements.

System requirements continue on bottom panel.

Minimum supported requirements

Certain product features are not available with minimum supported requirements.
800 MHZ processor and 512 MB of system memory
20 GB hard drive space with at least 15 GB of available space
Support for Super VGA graphics
CD-ROM drive

My DESKTOP
My Desktop PC is a AMD Duron 1.8 GHz processor with 768 MB DDR PC-2700 RAM, with a 160 GB hard drive. DVD-ROM, and a DVD+/-R/RW DL 16x burner. The video card that was in the Duron 1.8 GHz was also a 128 MB ATI RADEON 9200, but has been upgraded to a NVIDIA 256 MB GeForce 6200; and Vista still does not operate -- even though the Vista Upgrade Advisor says my system is compatible and will operate fine; and there is NO PROBLEMS with the hardware, I’ve checked.

My LAPTOP
My laptop as stated before is a Intel Centrino Duo Core Mobile Technology featuring an Intel Core Duo Processor T2050 (1.6 GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 533 MHz FSB), 1024 (1GB) system memory, 100 GB (5400) SATA hard drive, LightScribe Super Multi 8X DVD+/-R/RW drive with Double Layer Support.

If my other machines were able to use Vista, I would probably waste 4-8 hours for a freaking upgrade that probably won’t work. All the other systems here with the exception of my mom’s PC I built for her a long while back, are 350 MHz or slower. Then, there is my MAC, which is only a G3 350 MHz with four memory sticks (128MB, 128MB, 128MB, 64MB installed).

The bottom line to this entire article is: DO NOT PURCHASE A COPY OF MICROSOFT WINDOWS VISTA (any version,) UNLESS YOU HAVE THE ABSOLUTE TIME ON YOUR HANDS TO SCREW YOUR SYSTEM UP, OR TO TAKE CHANGES THAT IT MAY OR MAY NOT WORK ON YOUR SYSTEM. FOR ALL THE TROUBLES, THE PROBLEMS, AGRIVATION, AND OTHER CRAP, MICROSOFT SHOULD OF PAID ME TO PICK UP A COPY, OR BETTER YET, HAVE GIVEN ME A FREAKING COPY.

Don’t get me wrong, Windows Vista does install on my desktop and laptop, it just does not work right on the desktop (while all the hardware, drivers, etc., are fully compatible and up to date,) and the laptop (hah despite the “Designed for Windows XP; Windows Vista Compatible” bull-crap,) it ran fine, except for the serious lack of drivers. I might post the hardware reports from both my desktop and laptop later on.

I wonder what Windows Vista would say if I tried to install it on a Pentium II 350 with 256 MB of RAM, or one with 368 RAM. Probably something like, “Windows Vista does not support cheap customers who cannot upgrade their hardware. Oh wait, this is another error message that is generated by Windows, it is not Microsoft’s fault. And oh, you purchased Windows Vista, didn’t you?”

Anyway, I am probably now the proud owner of a new $159.99 coffee coaster because Staples will probably not take a refund -- wait till they see the crap I start with them if they don’t -- good money wasted but that is Microsoft’s fault, including HP - can we say FALSE ADVERTISING on both companies?